(text pages can be viewed HORIZONTALLY or VERTICALLY by rotating your screen)
A brand is a unique personality. It makes you stand out from the crowd and encourages loyalty. This means you gain trust and repeat-business.
Creating a brand identity requires practical design-skills as well as creative drive and flair. You also need a deep understanding of marketing and consumer psychology.
- defining an audience
- analysing competitors
- creating mood-boards
- naming the brand
- designing the logos
Brand identity is crucial in the areas of digital media, fashion, advertising, product design, packaging, and retailing.
Brands are a significant part of modern consumer society. And they are used to promote such things as: Clothing (e.g. “cool” jeans), Local Towns (Lossiemouth - “the Jewel of the Moray Firth”) or even the British Royal Family. However, it is not that easy to come to a clear-cut, and satisfactory definition, of exactly what a “brand” is.
You see, brands are much more than just the product you buy; they apply to services and concepts too, or even a “celebrity” (e.g. Lady Ga Ga). To be able to define what a brand is, and does, it is helpful to consider, firstly, why people buy, and what influences their choice of one product over another.
Being a consumer is about identifying one’s needs (some would say “wants”) and satisfying them by choosing, buying, and using a product or service. These needs can be as varied as the consumers themselves, although there are basic requirements that are fundamental for all human beings, namely: food, clothes and shelter.
These basic needs are then followed by more subjective needs. These are defined more by a person’s lifestyle, which, in turn, is pre-determined by their culture, society as a whole, as well as their social-group or “class”.
Purchases in this higher-level category are often driven, not by basic requirements, but more so by individual aspirations and desires. If decking, for example, is to be sold to a target audience of 50 year-olds, the adverts don’t depict planks of wood lying around. Instead an advert will have 30 to 40 year olds, sitting elegantly outside in the soft evening light, having a dinner-party. What is being sold here is aspiration, not bits of wood.
Social pressure (the need to fit in) plays a big part in all this. Some people want to appear more successful than the average person and this is highly influential in their buying decisions. Therefore, understanding why people buy, and the triggers that make them choose one item over another, is the key to designing a brand image for your company.
2. WHEELS OF FORTUNE
95 per cent of Crop Circles are man-made. However, the most complex ones are not. There is a secret agency whose full-time job is to make sure ALL circles are seen to be hoaxes. Four agents earn a salary, and have paid-for accommodation, which for the most part, lies empty. These flats are rented all around the world. These world-wide bases co-ordinate the manufacturing of the fake circles.
3. LASTING IMPRESSIONS
A human being processes around 11 million “impressions” or “sensations” every second. The brain decodes this information into sound, sight, smell, taste, and touch. We have many other senses too, but let’s just deal with these five.
Our sense of reality is constructed out of only 40 impressions a second, after our brain edits out and stores the rest. This other information (about 660 million “bits” in a minute - think how much that is in a day) sits in our subconscious, that is, our internal “hard drive”, and this affects and directs all our actions. Instructions are “downloaded” to us by bypassing our conscious mind. We are then under the illusion that we are acting under our own free will.
These behavioural instructions are bombarded to us via the Mainstream Media, in all its forms, and that is why we are increasingly encouraged to get “connected” to The System via all the gadgets that are provided for us.
On the other hand, animals on the planet Earth, don’t tune into the media and so they can sense and understand the world the way it really is, undistorted. Us humans, however, have had our perception “hacked” and replaced by a false reality.
4. ROBOT DAWN
The merging of humans with technology is fast pacing-up and promoted by universities and the Entertainment Industry.
You can trace this back to the 6-million-dollar-man (70s TV) and Robocop (80s movie) etc. The long-term plans is to incrementally introduce us to a new “normal” that we fully accept.
Part of this is: the micro-chipping of pets, teddy-bears … and then people.
If you care to look at IBM's website it will tell you a lot about your future. When IBM hold their big international meetings, every corporation attends. They must attend. You will see a list of all the top corporations across our planet.
IBM have given themselves the right to go ahead and create what they call the "smart grid" and also the "global smart grid" across the whole planet.
They plan to funnel a lot of our Western energy systems across the water (using undersea cables) to all countries across the world. Eventually, they will be able to cut some countries short at times, and route energy to some other country, as they see fit.
The subsidies we all pay in energy taxes is used to build all these big projects.
6. AMERICAN ANSWERS
During my political research on Henry Kissinger I came across some footage of actual Americans being interviewed on the street. Males, females, of all ages, all adults, who were just stopped at random.
Here are some examples of the questions asked, and the answers given, from these “regular” (and mostly very nice) people:
Q Name a country beginning with “U”
A 1. Yugoslavia 2. Utah 3. Utopia
Q What is the religion of Israel?
A 1. Muslim 2. Israeli 3. Probably Catholic
Q What religion are Buddhist Monks?
Q Who won the Vietnam War?
A We did
Q Who is Fidel Castro?
A A singer?
Q How many sides does a triangle have?
A 1. Damn...Four? 2. There’s no sides...one?
Q What is the currency of the United Kingdom?
A 1. What is the United Kingdom, I dunno? 2. Possibly American money? 3. Queen Elizabeth money?
Q In terms of the War on Terror, which country do you think we should invade next?
A 1. Saudi Arabia 2. Somebody in the Middle East 3. We should F***ing make a big blast crater out of the Middle East, for all I care 4. I’m thinking....Italy? 5. Cuba? 6. Iran, to stop the revolution 7. Russia or China 8. India and Pakistan 9. Indonesia or Brazil maybe 10. Korea, because they’re trouble, they’ve got a bad attitude 11. Canada
Q In terms of the War on Terror, which country do you think we should invade next?
The man was then given a world map to put a pin on it
A I think “France” he said, they’re too close, and there seems to be some friction between us. He then stuck a pin on Australia
Q Who is Kofi Anan?
A 1. A type of coffee? 2. Is it a Law Firm?
Q Who is Tony Blair?
A 1. I don’t even know him, is he a skater? 2. He’s an actor 3. Linda Blair’s brother?
Q Which countries are in the Axis of Evil?
A 1. I know Germany is one of them, but I’m not sure about the others. 2. Ok, California 3. Jerusalem 4. I think all of them. 5. Florida 6. Those guys that throw the rocks, Israel? 7. The fella with the turban thing, the guy with the diaper on his head?
Q Who was the first man on the Moon?
A 1. John Glen 2. I think it was a Russian, I’m not sure 3. Is that not the thing that was reincarnated in Arizona or somewhere and it didn’t really happen? 4. I don’t have any idea, was it an animal?
Q What is collateral damage ?
A Something to do with a movie?
Q How many World Wars have there been?
Q Which State does KFC come from?
A The chicken? I don’t know
Q What are Hiroshima and Nagasaki famous for?
A Judo or Sumo wrestling?
Q How many Eiffel Towers are there in France?
A I’d say about Ten
Q What is Al-Qaeda?
A 1. A suicide group in Israel who do suicide bombs and stuff and I think the President of it is Yaser Arafat, everybody knows that. 2. A wing of the Masonic order?
Q Where is the Berlin Wall?
A Believe me I know the answer......but I’m thinking....Israel?
7. NEW FRONTIER
The Truth revealed about Star Trek
Star Trek initially came out of the mind of Gene Roddenberry. The idea was of humanity being a peaceful space-faring people and all races were included in this vision, and we would go around the Universe exploring.
Roddenberry was presenting a hopeful future for the 60s generation. Star Trek today is a huge phenomena. What is interesting about Star Trek is, although it did come from the mind of Roddenberry, it goes back to 1963 and the programme Outer Limits which was produced by Leslie Stevens Jr.
Leslie Stevens Senior was a Vice Admiral in the Navy who was working with Admiral Rico Botta who was part of the Naval group who brought the German scientists over after the second world war in Operation Paperclip to start the secret space programme.
Star Trek is a product of the Rand Corporation which is a Think-Tank that has considerable influence over America, in particular with NASA and the US Air Force. The Rand Corporation directly consulted on the early episodes of Star Trek and with Gene Roddenberry. When you see things like phasers (tazers) and hand-held communicating devices (mobile/cell phones), sliding responsive doors, and the automation of everything, you are looking at predictive programming.
Pythagoras said “All is Number”.
Number coding is inside every sun and every atom. The Fibonacci sequence and the Golden Mean are deeply embedded in all that exists.
Our DNA decodes this programme to give us our perception of Reality.
In a similar way Wi-Fi networks use decoders (Smart Phones etc.) to present us with the World Wide Web. Without the ability to decode, we would see nothing. The Universe would be empty. If you lose your Wi-Fi connection then your personal universe becomes a blank screen.
The Universe, as a whole, is full of love and harmony. That, indeed, is its natural state. It has always been that way. However, there are small grains of Evil around, and unfortunately, our Earth is not representative of the usual Good state of everything. Here we have lots of Evil, and it is deeply present in those who rule over us, but quite rare in normal everyday humans. This Virus of Evil encourages us to fight among ourselves, because the virus, like any virus, feeds off of life itself, and can only function by destroying the host. Hence, the pain and suffering that our world is full of.
Humans are heart-based. Their natural state of being is to be kind and joyous. The Dark Force of Control, however, is heartless, and soulless. This force needs humans, but can never be human. Therefore, we are conditioned from birth to abandon our hearts (the Truth) and pursue the Mind-and-Brain version of the Programme (e.g. money, status, materialism, gratification, false knowledge, fame etc.).
But, when someone refers to themselves in conversation, they always point at their chest, where their heart is. And that’s the Truth. Our main Chakra point is our Heart which radiates and receives infinite love. And that is what the Evil Distortion cannot bear. We are everything They cannot be.
As we know a Columbo episode works to a well-established structure. The formula is as follows: (a) someone gets murdered right at the start, (b) the viewer gets to know who commits the murder and how they have actually done it, (c) Columbo then appears on the scene and continually hassles the murderer while mis-directing him (or her) by pretending to be scatter-brained, (d) the murderer tries to outwit Columbo (by covering their tracks) but they never succeed, and, in their desperation, usually botch things up, and finally (e) Columbo nails the murderer.
So I was wondering, if we know all this beforehand, why are we investing 1 hour and 15 minutes in the viewing? What is the reason to watch a Columbo? Why stick with it? You already know the outcome? What is the pay-off?
I would suggest the following are the reasons for watching a Columbo.
(1) It is set in a gentler and more charming age and so can be somehow comforting to watch. There is no gratuitous sex or violence and the viewer is not expecting to be offended by anything controversial or disturbing.
(2) The murderers are always well-to-do and live in fancy hooses and have fancy lifestyles and this glamorous lifestyle can be fun to peer into. "How the other half live", so to speak.
(3) The series often has Special Guest Stars who are well-known actors (e.g. Roddy McDowall, Ray Miland, Honor Blackman, Leonard Nimoy, William Shatner, Vincent Price, Donald Pleasence, Dick Van Dyke, to name but a few). These guest stars act their socks off for your entertainment (ok, sometimes they ham it up a bit, but that’s why we love them).
(4) Columbo is likeable and humble and kind and keen. And this is heart-warming to watch. It makes you feel good.
(5) On the other hand, the murderer is often arrogant. And so you want to see him (or her) jailed. You want to see their wee crushed face when their number is up. How could they possibly expect to outwit Columbo? More fool them.
(6) You want to see just how Columbo manages to trap the murderer. What device does he use to trip them up? You have to keep watching to find out.
A human being can look something up on the WEB and this gives them: (1) INFORMATION. Most people are happy with that. But there is a higher level we can reach which is: (2) UNDERSTANDING. This is when you grasp concepts that are abstract and then apply them to knowledge to gain a clear appreciation of what you know, and then, using fluid intelligence, you can apply your understanding to another situation.
But you really want to go higher than that, don’t you? Of course you do. What we are after is: (3) AWARENESS. That is the bit you get when you get the information, understand it, and then get above the understanding into an area which is intuitive and expansive. At this level the normal boundaries and limitations disappear. We gain awareness via our DNA programme which we receive downloads to.
Intelligence is one of the most important ways in which we judge one another and is a powerful and emotive issue for parents, teachers, employers and even politicians. However, it is still difficult to find a majority of experts anywhere who would agree on an acceptable definition of intelligence, as well as on its implications for human behaviour.
The nature-nurture debate is a long-standing argument over the relative contributions of experience (nurture, environment, learning) and inheritance (nature, heredity, genetic predisposition) to the make-up of an individual. But, clearly, both genetic and environmental factors influence IQ and therefore measured intelligence can be attributed to an interaction between both of these factors.
It is important, however, to understand that no matter how heritable intelligence is, some aspects of it are still malleable, that is, heritability of a trait is a separate issue from its malleability. Consequently, there is little doubt that a programme of training can increase some aspects of a person's intelligence, however, no training programme, and no environmental condition of any sort, can make a genius out of a person who is not particularly bright in the first place.
Real intelligence is about understanding, and being aware of what is important, and reacting appropriately in the circumstances being experienced.
12. STRAND THEORY
A human being can absorb (1) INFORMATION and (2) UNDERSTAND concepts. However, to reach a higher level of (3) AWARENESS and insight you need to break free of your limitations. These are: (A) being PHYSICAL and therefore relying on your five senses to judge everything, and (B) running on a DNA programme.
All information, and all physical matter, and all consciousness is wave vibration. Light and sound are wavelengths on the Electromagnetic Spectrum. Visible light and audible sound (for humans) occupies only a wafer-thin part of that whole spectrum. And so a human being only perceives a tiny tiny fraction of what actual information is around us. None of us can perceive WI-FI, for example without a decoder. But if we have a decoder then an astonishing amount of information reveals itself, that is to say the WEB.
But we tend to work on the principle if we cannot hear or see something it cannot possibly exist. Nothing could be further from the truth. A human brain only decodes a minute fraction of what is available.
Western education is about left-brain thinking. Let’s try some right-brain perception.
Imagine what the Earth was like a long long time ago (thousands of years in the past) when we had distinct civilisations, some of them highly advanced, but existing entirely separate from each other physically and culturally. These co-existing civilisations had their own technology, belief systems, and explanations of their world. And they were all at different levels of development.
It is no different today. It appears that there are a number of civilisations living on and around the Earth and the Solar System which have entirely different ideas, technology, and motives to that of humans. We assume that humans are at the top of the food-chain on Earth but this is not actually the case. It is not even likely.
There are quite a few breakaway civilisations who are here, but not officially announced to us humans, but nevertheless they’re around. Only a few political leaders know this. Most don’t.
There is at least one advanced species, with higher than human technology, which would explain the number of strange flying craft that get reported thousands of times each day all over the world. And several thousand animals, and indeed, humans, disappear each day, or their body parts are stolen from them, by using advanced laser surgery which humans can’t perform. This doesn’t get reported much because of the alarm it would obviously cause.
Also, someone is “toying” with our official military (who often try to intercept the advanced aircraft) and some other advanced life-forms are eating us. For example, 1500 sheep disappeared overnight from a farm in England recently without any explanation or trace, tracks, or sound; and this has not been reported or discussed by the mainstream news. This is a common occurrence
There may be at least three sets of advanced life-forms, other than humans, who have a lot of control, and a vested interest, in the planet we live on. There could be many more side-players too.
This cannot be disclosed as it would cause mass panic and the need for everyone to review everything they thought was true, everything they hitherto believed in. So not easy to let people know.
Change is a constant. A paradoxical oxymoron. It’s all about time. Modern life has fundamentally changed our sense of time. “We all live hectic lives these days” I heard Brian May, of Queen, say recently. Do we? Why? Is being “busy” a virtue in itself?
But even as we live longer, we seem to think shorter. Is it because we cram more into each day, or because the next person seems to cram more into each day? Everything is happening much faster, and more things are happening. What are we trying to prove by consuming time in this way? Are we seeing everything and understanding nothing?
In the 60s we were taught that, in the future, machines would automate work, giving us more leisure time. But now machines automate the production of attention-consuming information, which takes up all our time. Every minute of everyday life is to be used productively or it’s an opportunity lost.
Businesses focus on short-term results; politicians focus on elections; school systems focus on test results. Everyone knows about the big problems, but their behaviour focuses on the here and now. Best to concentrate on the current quarter, because who knows what job I’ll have next year, Best to pass that test, because what I actually learn, won’t be worth much, ten years from now.
We are information-rich but time-poor. We’re bombarded with so much information, from so many sources - video, audio, flashing screens - it’s like being fed too much processed, sugar-rich food. We no longer can easily discern cause and effect, put together a coherent story line, think scientifically, read a book with a single theme. We click, click, click our way through the world. What’s all the rush for? Is it a fear of running out of time? Is “hectic” a good thing? Something to be admired in itself? Does it make us happy?
When I get the time I’ll have a look into all this.
Does whisky conjure up emotions? What is going on when you encounter an outstanding bottle? The easiest way to make us feel something is to create a back-story, that is the “legend” behind the exquisite dram you are about to experience. Spin a wee story on the label about the “purity of the water” flowing through the Highland stream for hundreds of years, the lovely Morayshire barley fields, and the charred white-oak casks.
How else can whisky bring forth emotions? Well, the producers lace it with a lot of alcohol to evoke warm sentimental feelings and an inner glow too. The “look” of the bottle can hold many attractions for a drunkard, sorry I mean a connoisseur. The bottle’s gleaming surface must be enticing and should contain pictures of bagpipes. The condensation running down the side of the face of the drinker is also emotive in any advertising campaign.
Odour, of course, is the most obvious trigger of emotions. Smell projects directly to the amygdala, a centre in the brain for emotions and memory, and one swig can bring back immediate memories of being arrested in one’s youth, for many.
When you encounter an outstanding bottle, it’s the first sniff that lets you know that something special is happening. Later, before you pass out, or your money runs out, you will forget this initial “rush” of sensory overload. That first sip provides the moment when everything goes still, including your heart. You will be transfixed and gripped by feelings of euphoria because something very good is happening to your mind and body. Further sips of the precious liquid is like being caressed by a charming lady. These exceptional experiences, and heightened emotions, will always induce a smile and make your heart glad.
16. SOUND OF THE CROWD
John Donne observed that “No man is an island” capturing the fact that humans are essentially social animals. We all like to be “connected” to others and this is why mobile phones are so very popular. We are all dependent on our friends and family; our network.
So what happens when you take sides? That is, you might be watching a sporting event, for example, in which you have no particular interest regarding who wins, but yet you soon find yourself preferring one side to another. And it’s hard to stay aloof in any division of opinion, any quarrel or conflict.
Group thinking could be seen as an evolutionary advantage: clubbing together against a tiger or gang of aggressive strangers has obvious survival value. However, in modern times this natural inclination to be part of a group can have less constructive outcomes. This is the madness of crowds. People can be “whipped up” by charismatic leaders into collective blood-lust. We see it everyday in the media. People do horrible things, as one of a mob, that they would never dream of doing on their own.
So whose side are you on? The side of generosity-of-spirit, tolerance, and social justice? The side of love?
18. FRESNEL LENS
It is always worth carrying a Fresnel lens around in your suitcase. It is quite portable and thinner than a Frisby but about the same size. If you are staying in a hoose with lots of history you can stick then lens onto a window and peer through it to see if you can see anybody from the past who may have lived there. It all depends at what time of the day you look through it and the lighting conditions. Early morning is quite good for seeing figures. Not so easy to capture them on film however. It can be spooky right enough when one of the figures comes up to the lens quite close and peers back through at you. I suppose they must be looking into the future from their perspective.
19. FRACTIONAL RESERVE LENDING
The rules on banking finance are not set by governments, they are set by their corporate bosses, the privately-owned (for profit) Banking Cartel who run the American Federal Reserve.
This system allows banks to lend 10 times more money than they have on deposit. So if you borrow from a bank they simply create the money for your loan out of fresh air and type the numbers on a screen. And then they charge you interest on it. They need the signature of your Strawman, of course, to allow them to pull off this magic trick. They can even refuse you the loan and just keep the new money, all they need is your signature to create it.
But here’s where it gets crazy …
If you borrow £20,000, for example, and then go off and buy a car. The person you buy the car from will deposit that £20,000 you pay them into their bank account. Their bank can then lend (and charge interest) on 10 times the amount of the newly-received funds; that is to say £200,000.
National Debts always go up because of this method of generating money which has no backing in actual goods or precious metals. However the real danger lies in the fact that, if these debts are not met (with interest) then real items of value, such as houses, land, or a life-time’s work, pass to the bank as they seize it off you. Eventually, by this cunning plan, all wealth ends up in the hands of a small bunch of world Elite, and everybody else finds themselves increasingly getting squeezed financially and emotionally while the Elite are sitting pretty.
They can even seize a whole country’s assets if they wish.
Britain, Canada, and the US, and the like, are allowed to run up huge, off-the-scale, National Debts, because this is by far the best way to exert control over them. Meanwhile, because of the interest payments, they general population (taxpayers) are increasingly struggling to make ends meet and are experiencing budget cuts in all essential public services.
The movie Capricorn One (1978) is an enjoyable film about a manned mission to Mars. The plot is that they didn’t really go to Mars but actually faked it all in a studio to save face as they were unable to do it for real. Unusually for Hollywood, this film suggested that an agency of government would hoax such a thing. Because, almost without exception, all Hollywood films that feature military hardware and space stuff are pro-US. The pentagon ensures this, and budgets them, and writes the scripts you see; and they also allow the use of equipment etc. to make the films. The US therefore tend to come out "whiter than white" in these films and then they get huge surges in applications to "join up". Job done.
Bill Kaysing was a technical author for NASA who worked on various technologies and he had a great knowledge of the space industry. BK actually wrote a screen-play about a fake mission to the moon in 1977. It was allegedly a true account of a cover-up.
Capricorn One followed exactly BK’s script. The only difference was they substituted Mars for the Moon. This meant that, what was to be a true account of faking a moon-mission, was fictionalised into a story about Mars. BK sued the film-makers for breach of copyright.
The lawsuit failed because it appeared that the patent date recorded at Washington had been falsified thereby making it appear that the film about Mars was registered first before BK‘s script about the moon. But recent research shows that this could not have been the case. It looks like BK’s original work about the truth behind the moon mission was stolen and turned into a work of fiction about Mars.